Secure.gov sites utilize HTTPS
A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// implies you've safely linked to the.gov website. Share sensitive information just on official, safe and secure websites.
- About - The Attorney General
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
Utilities
- About About
Our Work
- Contact the Division Contact the Division
Report an Infraction
- Cases and Matters
- Press Room Press Room
Videos
Publications
- Employment Opportunities Employment Opportunities
Experienced Professionals
Chief law officer ´ s Honors Program
Volunteer and Paid Student Internship Programs
- Civil Rights FOIA Civil Liberty FOIA
Emmett Till Act/Cold Case Memoranda
- En español
- About - title=" About" About
- The Attorney general of the United States
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- title=" News" News
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- title=" Guidance & Resources" Resources
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Employment
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
- Our Offices
- Find Help
- Contact Us
Breadcrumb
1. Justice.gov
2. Civil Rights Division
3. The Fair Housing Act
The Fair Housing Act
- Facebook
- X.
- LinkedIn.
- Email
The Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq., prohibits discrimination by direct service providers of housing, such as property owners and property companies in addition to other entities, such as towns, banks or other loan provider and property owners insurance business whose prejudiced practices make housing unavailable to individuals because of:
race or color.
religious beliefs.
sex.
national origin.
familial status, or.
disability.
In cases involving discrimination in mortgage loans or home improvement loans, the Department might file suit under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The Department brings cases where there is proof of a pattern or practice of discrimination or where a rejection of rights to a group of persons raises a problem of public value. Where force or hazard of force is used to deny or hinder reasonable housing rights, the Department of Justice might set up criminal proceedings. The Fair Housing Act also supplies treatments for dealing with private problems of discrimination. Individuals who believe that they have been victims of an unlawful housing practice, may submit a complaint with the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] or submit their own lawsuit in federal or state court. The Department of Justice brings fits on behalf of people based on recommendations from HUD.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Race or Color
One of the central objectives of the Fair Housing Act, when Congress enacted it in 1968, was to forbid race discrimination in sales and leasings of housing. Nevertheless, more than 30 years later, race discrimination in housing continues to be an issue. Most of the Justice Department's pattern or practice cases involve claims of race discrimination. Sometimes, housing providers try to camouflage their discrimination by providing false information about accessibility of housing, either saying that nothing was available or steering homeseekers to certain areas based on race. Individuals who get such false information or misdirection may have no knowledge that they have actually been victims of discrimination. The Department of Justice has actually brought lots of cases declaring this kind of discrimination based on race or color. In addition, the Department's Fair Housing Testing Program seeks to reveal this sort of hidden discrimination and hold those responsible liable. Most of the mortgage lending cases brought by the Department under the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act have declared discrimination based upon race or color. Some of the Department's cases have actually also alleged that municipalities and other city government entities violated the Fair Housing Act when they denied authorizations or zoning modifications for housing advancements, or relegated them to mainly minority neighborhoods, due to the fact that the potential residents were anticipated to be mainly African-Americans.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Religion
The Fair Housing Act restricts discrimination in housing based upon religion. This prohibition covers instances of overt discrimination versus members of a particular faith too less direct actions, such as zoning ordinances developed to limit using personal homes as a places of worship. The number of cases filed because 1968 alleging religious discrimination is little in comparison to a few of the other restricted bases, such as race or nationwide origin. The Act does consist of a restricted exception that permits non-commercial housing operated by a religious company to reserve such housing to individuals of the exact same religious beliefs.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Sex, Including Sexual Harassment
The Fair Housing Act makes it illegal to discriminate in housing on the basis of sex. In the last few years, the Department's focus in this location has actually been to challenge sexual harassment in housing. Women, especially those who are poor, and with restricted housing alternatives, frequently have little recourse however to tolerate the humiliation and degradation of sexual harassment or threat having their households and themselves removed from their homes. The Department's enforcement program is targeted at property managers who develop an illogical living environment by demanding sexual favors from tenants or by developing a sexually hostile environment for them. In this way we seek both to obtain relief for tenants who have been dealt with unfairly by a landlord due to the fact that of sex and likewise discourage other prospective abusers by making it clear that they can not continue their conduct without facing consequences. In addition, prices discrimination in mortgage loaning might likewise negatively affect women, especially minority women. This type of discrimination is unlawful under both the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon National Origin
The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination based upon nationwide origin. Such discrimination can be based either upon the country of a person's birth or where his/her forefathers stem. Census data show that the Hispanic population is the fastest growing sector of our country's population. The Justice Department has actually taken enforcement action versus local governments that have attempted to decrease or restrict the variety of Hispanic households that may reside in their communities. We have taken legal action against loan providers under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act when they have imposed more stringent underwriting standards on mortgage or made loans on less beneficial terms for Hispanic customers. The Department has actually likewise sued loan providers for discrimination against Native Americans. Other locations of the nation have actually experienced an increasing variety of national origin groups within their populations. This consists of brand-new immigrants from Southeastern Asia, such as the Hmong, the former Soviet Union, and other parts of Eastern Europe. We have actually done something about it versus private property managers who have victimized such individuals.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Familial Status
The Fair Housing Act, with some exceptions, restricts discrimination in housing against families with kids under 18. In addition to prohibiting a straight-out rejection of housing to families with kids, the Act likewise prevents housing providers from imposing any special requirements or conditions on renters with custody of children. For example, property managers might not locate families with children in any single part of a complex, position an unreasonable restriction on the total number of persons who might live in a home, or limit their access to recreational services provided to other renters. In many circumstances, the changed Fair Housing Act prohibits a housing provider from declining to lease or offer to households with children. However, some centers might be designated as Housing for Older Persons (55 years of age). This type of housing, which satisfies the requirements set forth in the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995, might operate as "senior" housing. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has published policies and additional assistance detailing these statutory requirements.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability
The Fair Housing Act forbids discrimination on the basis of special needs in all types of housing transactions. The Act defines persons with a disability to mean those individuals with psychological or physical impairments that considerably restrict one or more major life activities. The term psychological or physical impairment might include conditions such as blindness, hearing problems, mobility impairment, HIV infection, psychological retardation, alcohol addiction, drug dependency, chronic fatigue, finding out impairment, head injury, and mental disease. The term major life activity might consist of seeing, hearing, strolling, breathing, performing manual jobs, taking care of one's self, discovering, speaking, or working. The Fair Housing Act also safeguards individuals who have a record of such a disability, or are considered having such a problems. Current users of prohibited regulated substances, persons convicted for illegal manufacture or circulation of a regulated compound, sex transgressors, and juvenile culprits are ruled out handicapped under the Fair Housing Act, by virtue of that status. The Fair Housing Act affords no defenses to individuals with or without specials needs who present a direct risk to the persons or residential or commercial property of others. Determining whether somebody presents such a direct danger needs to be made on a personalized basis, nevertheless, and can not be based on basic presumptions or speculation about the nature of a special needs. The Division's enforcement of the Fair Housing Act's protections for persons with disabilities has focused on two significant areas. One is guaranteeing that zoning and other guidelines concerning land usage are not used to impede the residential choices of these people, including needlessly limiting common, or gather together, residential arrangements, such as group homes. The second area is guaranteeing that freshly constructed multifamily housing is developed in accordance with the Fair Housing Act's ease of access requirements so that it is available to and functional by people with impairments, and, in particular, those who use wheelchairs. There are other federal statutes that forbid discrimination against people with specials needs, including the Americans with Disabilities Act, which is imposed by the Disability Rights Section of the Civil Liberty Division.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability Group Homes
Some people with disabilities may cohabit in congregate living plans, often described as "group homes." The Fair Housing Act restricts municipalities and other regional federal government entities from making zoning or land usage choices or executing land usage policies that exclude or otherwise discriminate against people with disabilities. The Fair Housing Act makes it illegal--
- To use land usage policies or actions that deal with groups of individuals with disabilities less positively than groups of non-disabled individuals. An example would be an ordinance forbiding housing for persons with disabilities or a particular type of special needs, such as mental health problem, from finding in a particular area, while allowing other groups of unrelated people to cohabit in that location.
- To do something about it versus, or reject a permit, for a home because of the impairment of people who live or would live there. An example would be rejecting a structure license for a home since it was meant to supply housing for persons with psychological retardation.
- To decline to clear up accommodations in land use and zoning policies and treatments where such lodgings may be essential to manage persons or groups of persons with impairments a level playing field to use and delight in housing. What makes up a sensible accommodation is a case-by-case decision. Not all asked for modifications of guidelines or policies are affordable. If a requested adjustment enforces an excessive financial or administrative burden on a regional federal government, or if a modification develops an essential alteration in a city government's land use and zoning plan, it is not a "reasonable" lodging.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability-- Accessibility Features for New Construction
The Fair Housing Act defines discrimination in housing against individuals with impairments to consist of a failure "to develop and build" particular new multi-family homes so that they are available to and usable by persons with specials needs, and particularly people who utilize wheelchairs. The Act needs all recently built multi-family homes of 4 or more systems meant for first tenancy after March 13, 1991, to have specific functions: an available entryway on an available route, available common and public use locations, doors sufficiently large to accommodate wheelchairs, accessible paths into and through each house, light switches, electric outlets, and thermostats in accessible location, supports in bathroom walls to accommodate grab bar setups, and functional bathroom and kitchens set up so that a wheelchair can steer about the space.
Developers, contractors, owners, and architects responsible for the design or construction of new multi-family housing might be held liable under the Fair Housing Act if their buildings fail to satisfy these style requirements. The Department of Justice has actually brought many enforcement actions versus those who stopped working to do so. Most of the cases have been dealt with by authorization decrees providing a variety of types of relief, including: retrofitting to bring inaccessible features into compliance where feasible and where it is not-- alternatives (monetary funds or other building and construction requirements) that will attend to making other housing units accessible; training on the accessibility requirements for those associated with the building procedure; a mandate that all brand-new housing tasks adhere to the accessibility requirements, and monetary relief for those hurt by the infractions. In addition, the Department has sought to promote ease of access through building regulations.
