The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on unlawful gambling.

No, they weren't personally in presence, but the world-famous celebrities were conspicuously consisted of in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes gambling establishments - the questionable websites providing both complimentary casino-style video games and profitable prizes, such as cash, gift cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can 'bet totally free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The websites are simply two cogs in the multibillion-dollar industry that now discovers itself besieged by lawsuits. In the eyes of many gaming corporations, not to discuss lawsuit plaintiffs and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos function as traditional casinos, just without the oversight, customer securities and tax laws. So not just can they prevent the steep 24-percent federal sports betting levy, however sweepstakes operators aren't subject to regulative hurdles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming defenses.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in profits last year alone. Now the business deals with accusations of unlawful gambling in a New york city lawsuit that claims VGW utilizes celeb endorsers to 'produce a veneer of legitimacy' around its item. (See VGW's declaration listed below)

'I'm unsure" if you do not trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton" is a winning message for companies running multibillion-dollar illegal operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's presenter, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a variety of celebrities from gambling lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, in addition to NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom use any distinctions between standard gaming and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among lots of sweepstakes casinos discovered online

Ryan Seacrest urges fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where numerous - however not all - games are complimentary

Drake has a deal with social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he regularly promotes on social networks

Learn more

Donald Trump 'set to name NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, advertisements normally focus around the social aspect of the gambling establishments, while omitting the potential for actual gaming losses.

Others lure consumers with pledges of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social media ad displaying Drake's automobiles, planes and estates before rotating to footage of the rapper playing online casino-style video games.

'Daddy, why do we have a lot cash?' read the very first caption on the screen.

Another caption discussed: 'Because I never quit.'

The inconsistency between gaming sites and social or sweepstakes casinos is a bit complex, but operators of the latter insist they're not involved with the former.

A spokesperson for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), explained its members are not in direct competitors with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA information, the majority of the players on social-sweepstakes gambling establishments are playing for complimentary.

'Most social sweeps customers never ever make a purchase,' the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. 'The minority of consumers who make purchases do so in amounts far smaller than the normal deposit or bet size at real-money online gaming websites.'

Social gambling establishments use consumers a chance to play casino-style video games with pals. Players have the option to purchase valueless currency typically described as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine cash, however can be utilized to open different features within the video games.

But within the world of social casinos exists sweepstakes gaming, permitting consumers to get other currency called 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for money or other prizes.

And therein lies the capacity for financial losses, like the ones claimed by plaintiffs in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One gamer informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes casinos in the past year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of money and other things of worth.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting an International Poker occasion

Social sweeps casino Stake ran an advertisement flaunting Drake's cars, aircrafts and estates

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online gambling establishments are banned in all but 7 states, which has assisted to sustain the appeal of sweepstakes casinos.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes sites, which do not need typically require recognition. However, websites like Chumba will ask for IDs from gamers attempting to withdraw any funds.

Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, permit consumers to submit mail-in requests for totally free sweeps coins, supplied the players follow painfully particular directions. What's more, gamers are often rewarded with sweeps coins simply for registering, therefore providing a factor to try their hands at any number of casino games for an opportunity to win - or lose - genuine cash.

So why are sweepstakes websites permitted to run in 48 states, while online casinos are banned in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their item is the complimentary casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is simply a means of promoting their support.

'Social sweepstakes video games are merely a form of online entertainment,' an SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com by e-mail. 'No purchase is required to dip into social casinos with sweepstakes rewards. Consumers never ever need to spend for an opportunity to win rewards. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" factor to consider" - is a crucial distinction in between social sweeps and traditional online sports betting websites like casinos.'

Consider the manner in which McDonald's uses its yearly Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to bet, but rather they're purchasing hamburgers and fries that offer them the opportunity to win lucrative rewards, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'consideration', the video game itself does not meet the definition of gaming in the US.

'Sweepstakes are a long-standing approach for promoting all sort of everyday services in the United States, whatever from burgers to publication memberships to coffee and home enhancement stores,' the SPGA representative told DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are frequently utilized by a who's who of home names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to many sports betting market experts, that argument does not cut it.

For beginners, video gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach mentions, McDonald's Monopoly video game does not run indefinitely. Rather, it has a distinct beginning and end, thereby recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's primary item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being utilized to promote real products like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They do not last forever and they're generally not tied to casino-style games of opportunity,' Wallach informed DailyMail.com. 'They're simply money free gifts.

'The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] possess none of the characteristics frequently related to McDonald's-style sweepstakes promotions,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in eternity, the sweepstakes gambling establishments provide" casino-like" payouts, typically 80 percent or more of revenues, whereas the typical payout portion for a short-term advertising sweepstakes is an insignificant share of the earnings made by the company [generally less than one percent]'

Wallach fasts to compare the online social sweeps casinos to the web cafes that emerged in Florida, offering consumers the possibility to play casino-style games for real rewards. Much of those brick-and-mortar facilities have since been shuttered over accusations of unlawful sports betting.

DJ Khaled is among several star spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps casinos should face comparable scrutiny.

'These differences are not arbitrary,' Wallach stated of social sweeps casinos. 'They have actually repeatedly been pointed out by courts and state attorney general of the United States as crucial consider determining that a sweepstakes promo was in truth a guise for prohibited gaming.'

One of the casino market's leading trade organizations, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing lawmakers to examine sweepstakes operators and, sometimes, enact brand-new legislation on the concern.

'Consumers are being denied of securities and states are passing up substantial tax and earnings opportunities as this gambling replaces that performed through managed channels,' read a well-circulated AGA memo.

And after that there are the plaintiffs who have actually sued social casinos in more than a dozen states.

Sweepstakes gambling establishment operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four different cases in Kentucky without confessing any wrongdoing, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW consented to pay $11.75 million in one class-action lawsuit, saying the settlement was made to prevent legal expenses and continued litigation.

Michael Phelps has actually signed an offer with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the latest lawsuit, which is mostly similar to its predecessors, New york city state citizens Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both claim to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is explained in the filing as an 'prohibited gambling enterprise. '

Apple and Google have likewise been called as offenders in suits for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for remark.

'We normally don't comment on matters before the courts,' a VGW spokesperson informed DailyMail.com by means of e-mail. 'However, we note that this claim has actually only just been submitted with the court and VGW has not been officially served.

'We have complete confidence in our compliance with all laws and policies where we operate, and remain confident about the future,' the spokesperson continued. 'We continue to offer our free-to-play games throughout most of North America, as we have for more than a decade, developing not only excellent games, user experiences and entertainment, however likewise ensuring this is done safely, properly and at the highest level of standards.

'More broadly, we 'd restate that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are relatively typical throughout the online social video games industry (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we mean to intensely defend any claim which may be brought versus us.'

The concerns between traditional online sports betting and sweepstakes casinos could show problematic for some celeb endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both endorse VGW's Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with standard video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's paradoxical that professional athletes are hawking illegal sports betting wagering 'sweeps' websites while at the exact same time the leagues wish to predict a strong position versus illegal gaming - specifically when attempting to tamp down the occasional gaming scandal,' Glaser told DailyMail.com.

It was just 8 months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter received a lifetime restriction from the NBA over claims he conspired with bettors. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything involving social or sweepstakes casinos.

Together with VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting apparently illegal gambling sites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes gambling establishments as a major problem for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd anticipate that a league crackdown on athletes backing sweepstakes sites is a matter of when, not if,' Glaser added.

Neither an NBA representative nor the players' representatives reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise overlooked to react to DailyMail.com e-mails.

Asked if their star endorsers have a responsibility to discuss to consumers the differences and similarities in between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW firmly insisted there is absolutely nothing more that needs to be done.

'We have full confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our company practices more broadly,' the spokesperson said. 'A few of our worths are" our gamers come first" and" we do what's right", and we put our values at the core of everything we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes websites, sees things in a different way.

'Celebrities who provide their names to dubious unlawful gambling sites are, at a minimum, putting their track records at risk as well as courting civil and class actions by consumers who allege harm,' Glaser said. 'There is also some danger that state regulators and state chief law officers rope star endorsers into enforcement efforts for assisting in unlawful sports betting.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton